BLACKOUT! Peter Daszak TESTIFIES With Whistleblower Dr. Andrew G. Huff | MSOM Ep. 873

Speaker 1: 0:00

Welcome to Making Sense of the Madness. It's a media blackout. Nobody's talking about this, but Peter Dazek is testifying before Congress, behind closed doors, in this investigation that's asking for documentation all the way back to 2014, yet no media reports. Well, we're gonna talk about that for the next hour with somebody that is on the inside of all of it. Andrew G Huff, the EcoHealth Alliance whistleblower and the author of the Truth About Wuhan, is about to join us. So buckle up and get ready to make sense of this madness.

Speaker 2: 1:05

How do we work that out from a viral sequence? It's not straightforward. So, as an example, first of all we're only looking at viral families that include those that have gone into people from animals. So we narrow it down straight away. Then, when you get a sequence of a virus and it looks like a relative of a known nasty pathogen, just like we did with SARS, we found other coronaviruses in bats, a whole host of them. Some of them looked very similar to SARS. So we sequence the spike protein, the protein that attaches to cells. Then we well I didn't do this work, but my colleagues in China did the work you create pseudoparticles, you insert the spike proteins from those viruses, sifted, bind to human cells and each step of this you move closer and closer to this virus could really become pathogenic in people. So you narrow down the field, you reduce the cost.

Speaker 1: 2:04

So there is Peter Dazek admitting to quote unquote gain of function research with bats and coronaviruses all the way back in 2016, sequencing what spike proteins that then are attached to human cells and bind with them. It sounds like an admission to me, but what do I know? We're going to be talking to Andrew G Huff. Thank you so much for joining us, sir, especially in light of the fact that the mainstream media is not covering this. It was not clear by this congressional letter that we'll pull up on screen briefly for people to check out on whether or not this was going to be testimony for the public or just transcribed, but they are requesting a number of documentation all the way back to 2014, which we'll discuss later. So first off, andrew, for those that may not be familiar with your story, tell us how you fit into being this eco health alliance whistleblower that discussed this type of research that was going on with your company and beyond.

Speaker 3: 3:13

Sure. So I have a very interesting background. In past, I started off my career in the US military, served in operation during freedom operation Iraqi freedom as an instrument, and then I had to change your heart. I no longer wanted to be in the military and my passion was science, so I went after it and then, through that, I became a doctor in public health, emerging infectious disease epidemiology, and worked for a variety of agencies at the Department of Homeland Security as a research fellow at the University of Minnesota Sandia National Laboratories, where I held top secret clearance, where I worked on pandemics, bioterrorism and all sorts of doom and glooms narrows related to public health, much of which I can't discuss. And after I was tired of working in the security state, I went on to look for new work and I landed a job at EcoHealth Alliance. I was hired as a senior scientist in 2014. That's the time period, that's a question. And due to my success there, I was actually promoted to vice president after I brought in about $6 million in short order. And once I was promoted to vice president, I was able to see under the hood at EcoHealth Alliance and that really You're still there. Oh, my video cut out on my side. Sorry, man, we're listening. Oh weird. Well, I can't see anything anymore. My screen went completely black, but if you can hear me, I can just keep going. So we didn't see it. That's the first time that's ever happened, not to say that my communications have never been screwed with before, but I can just do this like we're doing on the radio. That's fine. So, after my success at EcoHealth Alliance, I promoted it to vice president. I'm able to see under the hood and everything that's going on and I'm mortified by what I see and I leave EcoHealth Alliance in 2016. And after I leave EcoHealth Alliance, I never thought anything of it. I thought EcoHealth Alliance went really amount to much. And then, of course, the coronavirus pandemic happens in 2019. I get really wind of it. I know all the inside dirty secrets and mechanics of what was happening and I decided to finally come out as a whistleblower in 2021.

Speaker 1: 5:11

So let's talk about the pandemic in general and the narrative as it unfolded, that this was absolutely zoonotic. Now that's from a 2016 lecture with Dazik and others the video clip that we showed earlier and in it he's describing EcoHealth Alliance and what they do, and everything is zoonotic. He attributes Ebola, for instance, to probably from bats. He says that HIV is from chimpanzees and you just heard him associate what coronaviruses that were SARS-like with bats, and then that becomes the initial narrative, despite the fact that you're talking late 2019, into 2020. In 2016, these programs are clearly taking place. They're not just taking place with EcoHealth Alliance in America, but in China, on the record, and there's even partnerships with what are, like you said, our Defense Department, darpa, in particular. Can you go into that?

Speaker 3: 6:15

Sure, so does gain of function. Work at EcoHealth Alliance began in 2014, 2013, under the United States Agency for International Development. It was not Dr Anthony Fauci at NIH that began this work. That's how they collected the genetic samples from bats internationally. It was through this program called Predict. They're partnered with Metabiotta, uc Davis. Metabiotta, as you might be familiar with, was the company that Hunter Biden's Rosemont Seneca Investment Firm invested into. That was run by Dr Nathan Wolfe, so Metabiotta and EcoHealth were sort of frenemies of sorts. But anyways, these three companies or organizations were going around the planet collecting rare coronavirus samples. And then EcoHealth Alliance, specifically, was doing gain of function work in partnership with the Wuhan Institute of Virology and Dr Ralph Barak at the University of North Carolina. This is in 2014. So we collect that preliminary data and those genetic samples and then we use that for our next proposal to NIH at NIAID. That's Dr Anthony Fauci's section for the gain of function work. Dr Xi Zhengli, dr Ralph Barak, both presented on this work. When I was an executive at EcoHealth Alliance, I thought it was sort of boring research and I came to the conclusion while I worked there, being an expert in emerging infectious diseases, that there was no way that they were going to be able to predict or prevent pandemics from this work. So then, that work basically continues through 2017, 2018. I actually leave the organization in the summer of 2016. And in 2019, there is a proposal that's submitted by EcoHealth Alliance to what's known as the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, darpa. For your audience who's not familiar with DARPA, darpa is the organization within the Department of Defense that makes all the most advanced technology in the world. It's sort of like the queue from James Bond If you have some crazy idea, they have all the resources to make these crazy ideas a reality. In this diffuse proposal that they submit to DARPA, it basically is the recipe or the cookbook to make SARS-CoV-2. Everything that they're going to do in that proposal is found in this agent, SARS-CoV-2, the wild strain that's circulating, and this is not conspiracy, we're not about to tell you. There are a number of different organizations that we were sharing our intellectual property with through intellectual property transfer agreements the Wellcome Trust, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, various government agencies, all our partners on the Predict program. There's a long list of partners, and the reason why we're doing this is that rising tide floats all boats. There is huge financial incentives to be engaged in this research, because the real purpose behind this research is to engage in what's called a medical countermeasures development, and it's a Department of Defense or Department of Homeland Security term for medication or vaccine research or other countermeasures you'd use to counter pandemics, bioterrorism and biowarfare.

Speaker 1: 9:15

So really, you know, andrew, let me stop you there, because you just talked about all these different agencies and companies that are involved. But here's the key In 20, I believe it's 20 what 13.? You have, it's either 2013. Yeah, it's 2013, where you have Moderna, partner with DARPA, and these are part of the countermeasures you talk about. That's the ADEPT Protect program, and even then, this mRNA program is to fight biological whether zoonotic or natural in nature, or biological warfare agents and sequence them within days and use this mRNA technology to combat them. That leads to the strategic mRNA partnership over the years that includes many of the same names you just said the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, barda, merck, astrazeneca, the Institute Pastore, and really it's the bridge to really that medical I would call it techno-fascism that we saw in COVID-1984, to develop the drugs that will eventually be used to combat the virus that seems to be created by the people that develop the drugs. Is that too far or is that what actually happened, not a conspiracy theory?

Speaker 3: 10:32

Well, I don't know if I'd call them techno-fascists, but the one thing that you have to look at each organization that's involved and they have different motives for why that they would be engaged in this type of work. The one thing that most of them have in common is money. I mean, there's huge financial incentives to do this. There's no bigger market than the pharmaceutical world, because if you can get an injection or a drug, and every person, a developer on successfully, and every person on the planet wants one for one reason or another, that's a massive market. So there's huge money to be made in this. It's interesting that you mentioned Moderna. So one of the interesting characteristics or facts that came out about a year and a half ago is that one of the genetic sequences or actually two or three that are present in the wild circulating type of SARS-CoV-2 were patented by Moderna in 2015. We actually had there was a number of intellectual property transfer agreements that came out in late 2019 between Moderna, nih and Ralph Barrick, where Moderna was actually sharing some of the genetic sequence that they had in their possession back with Ralph Barrick at the University of North Carolina. So what really makes this interesting is that Stephen Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, helped build the Wuhan Institute of Virology with the French government. The French get kicked out and after the French get kicked out, everyone was trying to gain access back to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, because it was well known in the national security community that the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the bio weapons laboratory for the CCP. So what? I believe what was happening when I worked at EcoThe Alliance and I discussed this in my book the Truth About Wuhan is that we were actually trading advanced biotechnology from Dr Ralph Barrick's laboratory to the Chinese at the Wuhan Institute of Virology so Westerners can have access to their laboratory. So we could see what was going on. Now, whether this is an intentional event or a laboratory accident, I think all the evidence strongly suggests that this is a laboratory accident. That the likely index patient in China has been disappeared as a master's student working in that laboratory, and all their behavior and actions after late August early September 2019, from an intelligence perspective, indicates that this was a laboratory leak. The other interesting characteristic here, or fact here, is that Congress has been trying to paint this narrative that this disease emerged in November 2019, and that's just false. We've had a number of different whistle-blowers and experts from the intelligence community and other scientists come forward and discuss the HVAC leak in this laboratory in September 2019. The Chinese try plugging the leak in this laboratory and, who knows, when you have a leak with an aerosolized disease, that leak can go on for a period of weeks or months because it's a virus, it's aerosolized. You can't see it, it's in the air and it only takes a matter of days for a disease like SARS-CoV-2 to circulate the planet. I've ran models and actually developed the models and simulations for the government and other large companies. That demonstrates that these diseases spread around the planet in a matter of three to four days. It happens that quick. So, once again, going back to this timeline that Congress, both Republicans and Democrats aka the Uniparty have been talking about, this disease started spreading around the planet in November. First, they told us it was December. Well, that's been proven to be a lie. Now they're trying to convince everyone that was November. Well, that's a lie. We actually have the names of all the service members that fell ill at the Wuhan Military Games in mid-October 2019, us service members who actually have their name. And what happens at this World Military Games in October 2019, is that all these athletes show up to compete in this Olympic-like this competition and while they're there, they all report that the city is locked down. So if this disease started spreading in November, why is Wuhan already locked down in mid-October 2019? Why are these athletes getting sick? The athletes all reported that the Chinese officials were taking their temperatures constantly wearing high-vex suits and personal protective equipment. That would be very strange for a city that was operating normally. In my personal history, I received a very strange phone call from a woman by the name of Dr Amy Jenkins, who is the program manager for the Biologics Division at DARPA. At the time I was a tech executive out in California in the Bay Area. I was making a lot of money, and she calls me up and offers me the position of being the head of the Biologics Division for DARPA. And back in my top secret life, my deep state life. This is the pinnacle of a person's career. Typically, you get offered this position when you're in your late 40s, early 50s. At my time I was in my early 30s, so it's sort of strange that there would be offering this position to me and Dr Jenkins she's a very nice woman she says you and your wife Emily, think about it. We'll try to find a position for Emily too. Let's talk again tomorrow. And so we speak again the next day. I turned on the position and, thinking back, I had this realization in 2020 that the reason why Dr Jenkins likely contacted me when she did was that because, one, they knew this disease was already spreading around the planet and, two, I was the only person outside the sphere of influence of the government or the companies that they fund that could speak openly about this without fear of reprisal. Well, the government still ended up coming after me anyways. I've lost a few hundred thousand dollars in law fair type battles and harassment and hacking and all this other stuff, and just in this interview, I'm sitting here speaking to you and the screen went black. So the deep state, so to speak, is still playing games. They don't want this message getting out, but it's clear that the US government knew what was happening fairly early on, and that does suggest that there could be some other nefarious intent behind this. I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm a scientist. I go by facts and what I can prove, and I use logic, deduction and reasoning, but this is extreme effort by the US government and US government officials to obsticate their involvement in the development and engineering of this agent. I don't think they have sole responsibility unless they were involved in the actual release of the agent, because the Chinese could continue to do this genetic engineering work. One area that the US government is responsible for, though, is the transfer of this advanced technology from Dr Ralph Berwick's laboratory to the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Most people are probably not aware, but the State Department and the CIA has something called export control, and export control is a program and a process where these government officials monitor US government excuse me, us produced technology internationally so it doesn't fall into enemy hands. We don't want our advanced night vision, our advanced gyroscopes and missiles these types of technologies, laser technologies falling into our enemy hands, and they do the same thing with biologics. So the idea that the intelligence community wasn't aware that we were transferring the most advanced biotechnology in the world from Dr Ralph Berwick's lab to what was known as the Bioweapons Laboratory for the Chinese is absolutely absurd.

Speaker 1: 17:28

It's absolutely absurd. And in this documentation they are requesting all of the communications with the Central Intelligence Agency and the FBI. We've got to take a break. There are so many points that you just hit on that we have to revisit when we come back. We're joined by Andrew G Hoff. The book is the Truth About Wuhan. We'll be back after this to talk more Peter Dazik and his congressional testimony in a moment.

Speaker 4: 18:00

Banks are supposed to be the safest placeholders for cash in the world, but in 2022, that changed. The Federal Reserve pulled out 2.5 trillion of liquidity out of the banks, and the Fed also changed the requirements, so banks don't need to keep any funds on hand. This means banks are starved for liquidity and have now become very dangerous places to hold your assets. Get out of the system with the world's safest and most private assets silver and gold. Call Kirk Elliott PhD at 720-605-3900.

Speaker 5: 18:34

I don't know if this country can be saved. The information war on any battlefield, on any physical battlefield that I have been on, has always been the most important component of war itself. So they were actually people in our government that were in the executive branch undermining the president of the United States without his knowledge. So that's basically an act of treason.

Speaker 1: 19:16

And we are back with Andrew G Huff. Andrew, I want to take you back to where you were talking about patents, and Moderna in particular, because what you said was in 2015,. They were already patenting these drugs that had sequences of the quote unquote zoonotic at least, that's the narrative that they were selling us on virus that was released. Now the people that have put that out I believe it was a 12 sequence DNA nucleotide and what they patented as a cancer drug that was one of those sequencing. Am I correct?

Speaker 3: 19:48

That's correct. So what they were actually patenting were the sequences. For what purpose they use it matters so much less, or matters less.

Speaker 1: 19:54

Yeah. So again, that would be a statistical impossibility for it to be of a natural origin. Yet we know that's what DASIC, fauci Collins and other end up pushing through this narrative. So when you talk about culpability, whether intentional or not, and lying after the fact, well, they lied throughout the narrative. You just mentioned that. Really, the evidence and we discussed this last time you were on the show shows that it was probably in the United States either mid to late September, into October as well, and you talked about the Wuhan games being in October. We had one of the worst flu seasons ever. And then you look at when they were selling us on the COVID 1984 virus but they told us the flu disappeared from the planet. I mean, that's a real thing. That was the World Health Organization and others said it literally was gone. So narrative management, I think, is another one of these crimes, especially when you're censoring everybody and locking them down. Let's get to DASIC and his role. What do you think Peter DASIC will be culpable of, seeing he was the head of a lot of these programs and the communication point between these laboratories.

Speaker 3: 21:40

Well, I think he's going to be found viable in a number of the civil suits that I am an expert in. So there's two big cases. One case is in the Western District of Texas, that's federal court, and other ones in the state of Missouri and that's with attorney Bruce Kips on both those cases and so the negligent homicide that those cases can be replicated by any individual that wants to sue equal health alliance or excuse me wants to sue equal health alliance or NIH or some of these other organizations that were involved in the federal government side, so there's going to be huge financial liability potentially there. I don't know to what ability or what extent the federal government is going to be able to be sued or held liable, because think about it we can't have millions of people around the planet suing the US government successfully will go bankrupt. I think that kind of pressure, though, will result in criminal charges against Dr Peter Dasek, dr Anthony Fauci and Dr Ralph Barrick. What's so damning about Dr Peter Dasek and what I bring to the table is that I made him aware and the executive team of the risks involved in these projects. I was against Gana function, I spoke out against it and executive meeting. I was against the work that we were doing with China, specifically because I thought it posed a significant national security threat and also a threat to the company, because what do the Chinese do in terms of business? They lie, cheat and steal. The reason why this work was allowed to be done was because this was a intelligence operation. That's my belief and my personal opinion, and I think all the evidence strongly suggests that. So the question is who do we hold liable? Well, you hold liable the contractors and the bad actors and the people who profited and took advantage of that. It's one thing to say that I'm going to contract and I'm going to take this money and I'm going to do it. If I don't take the money, somebody else will take the money and do the work. On the other hand, we still need to be ethical in science and all the damage that they've done to public health. It's going to take 100 years to undo all of this damage at least. I mean, vaccines now are not going to be taken by most of the population. They see, all the sales are going down and all the big pharmaceutical companies and vaccines and I'm not saying that all vaccines are good, but vaccines do have their place. There are some that are highly effective. There are some that are not effective. They brought this dangerous product to market that being mRNA vaccines without the proper testing, and they did that through other transaction authority, through the Department of Defense. So there's just so many different lies here. I mean, most Americans believe that Dr Anthony Fauci is responsible for bringing the mRNA vaccine to market. Well, that's not true. The way that the mRNA jabs were brought to market was through this process, called other transaction authority under the Department of Defense, which is a wartime powers that through wartime powers that they possess and with those wartime powers, they can put a medical countermeasure like the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine into production using a million different subcontractors. There doesn't have to be quality control On top of it. Subject matter experts like myself. We agreed to give these pharmaceutical companies immunity, and we did that because there could be a national emergency situation where you say that you have a bug or a bio terrorism agent that kills 80% of the population and me, being a military man, and a lot of other people, national security being military people, how many people are you willing to sacrifice to save or win the battle? So if the disease is killing 80% of the people but the vaccine has a chance of killing 20% of people, well we're going to save more than we're going to lose. So let's risk, let's bring a risky product to market, but never in a million years did people like myself believe that emergency use authority would be abused to then sort of twist the data to then actually get regulatory approval for high risk products. And that's exactly what happened. You can't make this stuff up. And most of the population, I think, is still oblivious to these facts, but every day is getting better. I think the great reawakening has happened about a week or two weeks ago and I think things are. The future is looking brighter because everyone's finally becoming aware of these issues.

Speaker 1: 25:44

Well, number one, only about 3% are taking these quote unquote new boosters. There seemed to be a push for masking and lockdowns. Again, that failed. Most people have had enough of it. But, like you said, they're not aware of the Defense Department aspect. And to me this is the most troubling aspect because, andrew, once you involve the military, and especially the Department of Defense, there's a thing called plausible deniability and levels of what classification? You know this well and they don't really have any obligation, especially in an emergency, even if the numbers were cooked, to be honest with the public about what's in these shots, how effective they are, obviously, and then what the liability will be will be a K the risk to reward ratio. We know that risk to reward ratio. Now, I don't know what the reward was. Myocarditis you could tell me. I mean, there's a number of other things that you got rewarded If you took these things. But it wasn't immunity, it wasn't stopped from transmission. I don't believe their talking point, which was Brunasian, that somehow it was going to keep you out of the hospital or keep you away from death. So are they ultimately liable? And is this process we're now seeing where the Defense Department, the CIA, the FBI, a number of universities, including Chapel Hill, are on the hook for their documentation with EcoHealth Alliance until 2014.

Speaker 3: 27:15

Oh, they're absolutely on the hook into what degree for each agency in which you enter, your company or academic institution varies. I think UNC could be could be bankrupted by this easily. The Department of Defense is actually liable to service members because in the contract that you sign with the government they say that they will take care of you for any service connected injuries. So even if you get sick from the virus while you're on active duty or if you get injured by the vaccine that they give you, they're liable for that. So the liability payments are going to go through, the disability payments are going to go through the roof for the Department of Defense and that's already happening. Test charges are at an all time high for vaccine injuries. Dr Teresa Long, who's a lieutenant colonel surgeon down south for the Army, we were just speaking on the phone yesterday and she told me that she's actually worried about the US military having enough members to participate in war. So it's a force protection issue as well. Now, in terms of the liability from the product, the product and the disease and the vaccines. Well, okay, so we just had the SV 40 promoter issue decided in my state in Michigan, saying that the product, that the vaccine ingredient wasn't listed, this SV 40, which can cause cancer. Therefore, pfizer can be sued, and Moderna for product contamination or adulteration. It might have just been Pfizer and might be off on who's actually liable for that.

Speaker 1: 28:42

Let's stop right there, because this was something that came out much later and I think that people need to understand the significance of what you just said. When I was warning people about the hate and lie shots well before they were developed, I was using the example that the polio shot contains something called SV 40 or simian virus 40. Now, this was something that was known to cause cancer, and I believe it was apes and other hominids, and in fact, people did win massive lawsuit cases back in the day, not just from the polio vaccine but being an interaction with their babies sometimes. Who got that vaccination? Okay, then we find out much later. You know I was skeptical, but now you're telling me the court case has been one that SV 40 was actually sequenced into these shots because, again, these were not developed traditionally. Instead, what they do it did was took the sequence of something known to cause cancer and put it into these biomolecularly printed shots. Am I correct?

Speaker 3: 29:49

That's correct and the issue actually stems from something called a good manufacturing processes. So in the food and drug world there's this, this FDA rule that says producers of food and drugs must use good manufacturing processes. You can get a specialization in this, you can get a certificate. Some people go to school for this and sometimes it's a division of environmental, health or toxicology. So you have have this, the specialization, you have this administrative rule and what they have found the people who are actually researching the ingredients of these vaccines. They found that they're contaminated and that contaminations not uniform, because you actually look at how products are manufactured supply chains you have one company that makes one ingredient or a precursor and that goes off to another company and then they do their next step and there's a supply chain. So the real trick here is figuring out which batches of this product were contaminated. I believe I don't believe it was all of them from looking at the data, but if you look at it, I believe in my expert opinion that it's due mostly to batch contamination. If they would have stuck to the recipe which had been FDA approved and I think many people did receive the approved version of the product it looks like the vaccine, injuries are much lower in that in that group. So this contamination issue is a big issue and it's not just the SV 40, but it's the SV 40 when it's combined with the plasmids which really causes the risk. And this plasma contamination can happen a number of different ways.

Speaker 1: 31:18

We have to take another break. We're going to come back with Andrew G Huff. We're going to talk more about this congressional testimony, but also the documentation they want. We mentioned the CIA, we mentioned the FBI. The Department of Energy is in there and that has historical significance as well. We'll be back after this with more making sense of the madness.

Speaker 7: 31:49

When I invented my pillow, my passion was to help each and every one of you and 20 years later, all of your support is what keeps us going. Because of you, we've been able to create thousands of USA jobs and help millions get the best sleep ever. To thank you, my employees and I are bringing you a limited edition MyPillow the Giza Elegance MyPillow is made with my patented adjustable fill, the most amazing cotton and a 2 inch pipe cusset. It has 4 custom loft levels, machine washable and drivable, and you get my 60 day money back guarantee and 10 year warranty.

Speaker 6: 32:24

Go to MyPillowcom or call the number on your screen. Use your promo code to get your limited edition 20th anniversary MyPillow queen size Retails for $69.98, not only $19.98. That's right. Get a queen size MyPillow for only $19.98. From all of us here at MyPillow.

Speaker 7: 32:41

Thanks, America.

Speaker 1: 32:49

The Truth About Wuhan is the book where we're with Andrew G Huff and we're talking about really not only Dazsic but this whole situation, and in this request from Congress again he's testifying. It's going to be transcribed today. They're also requesting documentation from the Department of Energy. Now, for those that don't know, back in the 90s Bill Clinton had to come out and say, hey, our government did test on not only military members and people in prison, but US citizens. And although some of these things were ethical, a lot of them weren't and a lot of them were done by the Department of Energy. And the Department of Energy did radiological and biological experiments on US citizens without their knowledge. This alarms me. What is their role with EcoHealth Alliance and this quote unquote gain of function research?

Speaker 3: 33:43

That's interesting. You're the first person to ask that question. So prior to working at EcoHealth Alliance, I worked at Sandia National Laboratories, which is one of the premier national security laboratories for the Department of Energy, and there's another laboratory in the north of Sandia National Laboratories called Las Alamos National Laboratories, and Las Alamos and Sandia historically work really closely together because it's all about the physics and the engineering of the atom bomb. These are the two laboratories that work on it. They're the most secure and classified facilities in the US. Under the Department of Energy and at Las Alamos National Laboratories they have been working on the human genome and they've been cataloging all sorts of rare viruses. I have to be careful what I speak about this laboratory at this point, but I can say that if you were to go Google search this or search for this on your favorite browser, you'd be able to look up the different information that they publicly posted related to their genetic engineering work or genetic and analytical work.

Speaker 1: 34:44

Exactly. Well, I mean, I understand that you can't talk about it because you have inside knowledge. Listen, I get it. A lot of this stuff is in the public arena, because when you think of something like the Department of Energy, the last thing you're thinking about are, I would say, bioengineering or geoengineering or any of these type of biological programs. Yet they're really at the forefront. And then they have these different classification levels. Again, this documentation is being requested. We'll see where it goes. Will there be criminal repercussions outside of the outside of the arena? If you want to say something else, I'd be more than happy to hear from you.

Speaker 3: 35:23

Yeah, sure, I just wanted to hop in real quick because I think it's important. So when I was working at Eco at the Alliance I actually tried to foster the relationship between the national laboratories and Eco at the Alliance so we could submit joint proposals. So actually while I worked there that relationship was never cemented. It could have happened after I left Eco at the Alliance. But if you look at some of the interesting aspects of the genetics of SARS-CoV-2, it does look like there's a missing sequence, there's a missing relative between this specific strain called HKU and another one called RAT-13. So there's a missing link here between these two and that's how SARS-CoV-2 develops and really it's the hunt for wherever this missing family relative is of these two agents. I believe that that was in possession at Eco at the Alliance. And a little bit about my story is that I started speaking with an individual by the name of Mike Bennett. This guy calls me up at work. He pretends like he's interested in buying some of the biotechnology that my company was selling and then he quickly moves or segues the conversation to talking about all my time at Eco at the Alliance. I tell him that I have a copy of the missing sequences, or I likely have a copy of the missing sequences from the work that we were doing in Southeast China on a hard drive in my house and, next thing you know, this hard drive is stolen from my house the next day. So it's likely, or as I've proven now, that Mike Bennett was a Naval Intelligence Officer, a DHS official and also affiliated with ODNI. So this guy steals a hard drive or he's working on the team that steals this hard drive from my house. So this missing genetic sequence was either property of the US government or property of Eco at the Alliance. It's hard to say, but based on the fact that they stole this drive from my house, I'm pretty sure the US government knows that this sequence exists and somebody has it.

Speaker 1: 37:20

Well, that, I hope, is an exclusive here today, andrew. I mean, that's just mind blowing stuff At the same time. That's how the system works, that's this public private partnership and these levels of classification, and you just brought the Office of Naval Intelligence into there, and a lot of people don't even know what ODNI is. My question stands from before Do you think that anybody is going to be held criminally culpable for any of this? I mean, here we are almost four years on from the inception of the hysteria surrounding it, the misinformation, disinformation campaigns, the censorship campaigns, and a lot of this is based again in the work of not just DASIC but those that surrounded them and then to control the narrative afterwards. So what, what likely are we going to see from Congress? Will this spawn into a real investigation into those who are criminally culpable, or is it going to be a whitewash and a bunch of lawsuits?

Speaker 3: 38:20

Well, I think one leads to the other. Like I said before, there are only so many civil lawsuits that Equal Health Alliance and the federal government, the University of North Carolina, uc Davis, all these Metabiot, all these companies that are involved with this, can handle financially. And when it becomes apparent to the courts and all the litigators involved that they're going to run out of money by from suing Equal Health Alliance I mean they can probably only handle a couple lawsuits before they go bankrupt and people are still going to want justice then they're going to turn to the government and then Congress will be incentivized to act, either through passing a law to mandate some kind of investigation towards these criminals, or it will just be a simple criminal referral over to the FBI, and then justice will run its course, and I think actually the latter will be the course that this takes. Remember, the government moves slow and there's huge liability and it's there's so many different people involved in the federal government with this. Nobody wants to be held accountable. This probably takes place after the next election, would be my guess. I think that this is going to drag on until 2025, 2024, 2025. And that's when the criminal proceedings will begin.

Speaker 1: 39:38

We got to take a break. We come back. I want to talk more about those that are named. They actually go down the list of individuals and institutions. It is making sense of the madness. The book is the truth about Wuhan. More with Andrew G Huff after this.

Speaker 8: 40:05

This is Sean Morgan with an AMP Consumer Report. I'm here with Danny Rosenberg, a specialist in insurance, and Danny. A lot of people are worried about Bidenomics, about the situation with the economy, how volatile everything is, and they're curious about fixed index annuities. What are the advantages?

Speaker 9: 40:20

So a lot of people are looking at fixed index annuities as a separate asset class. You don't have any downside risk, you don't have any downside volatility or capture or drawdowns, but you still get some of the upside and people will actually purchase annuities for two basic reasons. The first is guaranteed income for life. So the only way you can really guarantee an income stream you cannot live is through pensions, through social security or annuity. The second reason people are interested in annuities is because they want what's called a protected growth strategy and again, you'll get some of the upside of the equity markets with no downside risk, no downside volatility, no drawdowns or corrections. So it actually acts as a separate asset class and is a great way to protect assets.

Speaker 8: 41:05

That's great and I know for a limited time you're offering free consultations for those who are seriously interested, so we'll put a link in the description below where people can book that consultation. Thank you for your time, danny.

Speaker 1: 41:27

We are back with Dr Andrew G Huff. And Andrew, you stated that you think it's going to get to the FBI. Nobody wants to take credit, but I think the FBI has some culpability here. Even though Chris Ray is like where the first one's to say it might have leaked out of a Lab, I think when you look at some of the documentation that's going to be out there, it may not Be so favorable for the FBI. So I agree they're going to drag their feet. Who knows what happens in 2024 but if we don't get our country back, I think there's zero chance of any criminal culpability and we really need it in this case. However, the documentation here that's requesting all these communications and associations actually names more than 20 names. I'm not going to read them all, but they start off with Charles Callasher. Dennis Carroll, read a call. Well, are there any names on that list that you are particularly interested in seeing those communications through?

Speaker 3: 42:23

Well, absolutely the number one would be Dr Dennis Carroll. He was the former director of the USAID predict program which funded the the Coronavirus sample collection globally. He's also the director now of the global viral Project and I think he's out of the University of Texas or he's in Austin where he's. He's basically running this predict 2.0, but through a private entity which is funded by the Chinese globalist organizations, different government organizations and Really they're going to try to air attempt to continue this work that they're doing at equal alliance through the global viral project. So if we want to prevent this from happening in the future, we have to take a hard look at the global viral project and what they're up to, who's funding it and why. And the simple policy mechanism that Congress could enact would would be to have a complete ban on gain of function research. But I don't think that's going to happen unless there's also a new international Treaty on bio weapons, because the 1972 bio weapons convention is out of date and, as you can tell, if you know, you're allowed to engage in this gain of function research to make medical countermeasures. It's a loophole and you can see that the logical conclusion here is that eventually there's a laboratory accident was something that's very dangerous, and that's what we've been scared about for decades.

Speaker 1: 43:41

So another thing that's really alarming about this is that, even when you had an event like 9-11, right, the 9-11 Commission wasn't put together right away, but you had the initial Congressional investigation, even though it was Bob Graham and Porter goss, and Porter goss would become the head of the CIA, but you had some window dressing on it. There is no window dressing. In fact, there was just this private investigation into the coronavirus pandemic and was actually headed by or overseen by, philip Zellicao, who oversaw the 9-11 Commission. As far as I know, this again, almost four years later, is the first steps Congressionally to step in on this aspect and, like you said, there doesn't seem to be a movement to stop this gain of function Research. That, coupled with the fact, as far as I know, we're the only ones covering this story today, where does that say? We're out in America, like again. We're not even whitewashing these things. There are no investigations and, just like you said, this is probably not going anywhere. Till after the presidential election. We have a media blackout. Where is this country? How do we change that?

Speaker 3: 44:56

well, I think at the state level there's been a number of State representatives and senators across a nation that have introduced Legislation to ban gain a function. I actually authored the bill for the gain of function ban here in the state of Michigan and introduced it with Rep Brad Bacchette. The problem is the Republicans in this state. I don't have control of either the, the House or the Senate, so you know that bill is sort of dead on arrival. But you know we're trying, and other states have had more success. They're doing the same thing in Wisconsin. Wisconsin actually has a BSL for laboratory working on highly pathogenic avian influenza and where they're doing this gain of function work to make a human transmissible, and it's one of the most dangerous laboratories in the world, right right in the heartland, right in Wisconsin, and they had a near miss three years ago. So this hits hits close to home for people live in the upper Midwest. There have been a series of accidents. The other thing, though, that you have to keep in mind it's important for the audience to know is that when you hear the words gain a function, not all gain a function. Research is bad. Gain a function research is actually used to make insulin, for example. So the devil is really in the details with the stuff, and we have to have policy experts and we have to elect people into Congress and at the Senate that are going to do something. I mean, the check on power here is supposed to be Congress and and really what Congress needs to do is they need to start stripping back Executive authority. I don't care if you support President Trump or if it's as president Biden or whoever the next president, whether it's RFK Junior, it doesn't matter. What Congress needs to do is start taking back Executive authority. We can't be ruling our country by executive authority more. It's actually one of the most dangerous things, I think, for the country. We should be following the Constitution and what we should be doing is having Congress being the body that just makes these huge decisions, not just the stroke of the president's pen, and and that is really one of the biggest constitutional issues our country is facing.

Speaker 1: 46:48

Well, you talk about the security state, and I feel like we now, like have talked about executive rule by executive. We have an executive within an executive. That's what a lot of these black programs are to me. I mean, first of all, you have the continuity of government program, which I'm sure you're familiar with, especially being in these scopes of biological warfare and doomsday scenarios, so that, right there, almost usurps the executive power of the president of the United States, and then you don't have any accountability when something goes wrong. I think that we're in an extremely rough spot. I am encouraged by reading this letter and seeing what is being requested now. Whether or not, again, anything comes of it, we'll see. Is there anything else in this hearing today, this testimony, that of Dazsac, and in this letter, because all this documentation should have been provided by now. I think November 3rd was the deadline that should be focused on that I'm missing. That should be talked about.

Speaker 3: 47:52

Well, I would actually conduct the investigation slightly differently. I just ask them for all records and then I would conduct my own investigation on those records. All communications I will. You know. If you specifically name people, that's great. You know that might help Filter down and make the the search for information easier for congressional staff. But you might miss something. So I would cast actually cast a broad net and then go through it myself and take the time to read every document Just like you would. What an illegal event investigation we got to take one more break when we come back.

Speaker 1: 48:27

I want to talk about your future, what you're up to and how people can support your work. The book is the truth about Wuhan will be back with dr Andrew G Hub after this.

Speaker 4: 49:04

You Get more out of your amp news experience with amp insider, with seven billers of focused information, including wealth strategies. Find comprehensive videos on understanding precious metals and start building wealth the right way. Support the mission of amp with a subscription for 9.95 per month. Get the first month for $1 by using promo code amp 888 Welcome to a new era of connecting patriots.

Speaker 9: 49:37

Amp insider.

Speaker 1: 49:45

Final segment of making sense of the madness. Now, andrew, you've discussed the law fair that's been waged against you. Discuss the $100,000 that you had to spend Fighting this. What are you up to right now? Are you writing another book? Are you ever going to be able to disclose more publicly? Are you trying to get into any possibly I don't know classified sessions and give your testimony? What can we expect from you?

Speaker 3: 50:13

Well, you can expect that Congress doesn't want to hear anything that I have to say. I've actually communicated with the House Intelligence Committee in the past, also the code select committee and actually I think I'm responsible for Congressman Brad Wentz from not seeking reelection Actually filed a whistleblower retaliation complaint about three weeks ago and, it's interestingly, the general Miley stepped down three days later after I filed that whistleblower Whistleblower reprisal complaint and since then there's been a series of fallout throughout the US government in the state of Michigan for all the different people that have been involved in the retaliation against me. I actually have other legal tricks up my my sleeve that I could pull other executive branch levers Against all these people who did all this terrible crap to myself and my family. And you know I could fight these people forever in court and probably get rich off it, but that's really not what I want to do. I'm a scientist. I always have another book or two or a publication in the works and writing is never, never ending In a. It's very interesting, you know. I actually feel like we've won this, this war, or at least from my perspective. So everyone now knows that this was a laboratory leak, that Eco Alliance was the likely source of it, and the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was a product of this Bioweapons research. So I've accomplished all my objective. Dr Dastick is testifying today and I just had one of my other friends over who's an expert in this, charles Rixie. He was a formal weapons, weapons of mass destruction, destructions at expert and and bio defense at the Marine Corps and we were chatting about this. You know, like wow, we accomplished everything that we set out. The only thing we haven't accomplished our, you know, critical criminal charges against these people. You know, what do we do next? In my district, where I live in Michigan, everyone's pressuring me to to run for Congress. I'm not sure if I want to do that. It's a it's a very thankless job. Otherwise I'm probably gonna go back to either. You know technology, development, engineering, and that's really where my passion is.

Speaker 1: 52:00

All right, so let's talk about this whistleblower filing that you put out there. What does that mean? Are they going to have to respond? Obviously, you said you think there's already been some repercussions out there, some people stepping down, but what do you think the likely response of that is going to be?

Speaker 3: 52:16

Oh, I think there's gonna be a huge, massive follow. I mean they're gonna have to be, they're gonna have to pay me number one. I mean what they did? They violated my civil liberties and that these government officials and I have their names and committed all sorts of criminal acts. I have the specific names of Michigan State police officers and Marquette County Michigan Officers that were involved, including my sheriff, sheriff Zybert. They just actually went all the way to the top of the chain, the Michigan State police, and through this counter intelligence Operation that we ran to figure out who was involved with this, it traced back to the Department of Defense. So the Department of Defense was working through what's called an FBI liaison. That would be Laurie J Bennett as her name. And guess who Laurie J Bennett was married to or related to? Probably, we think, mike Bennett, the Naval Intelligence Officer that stole the drive from my house it. So you can't make this up. I got to have all their names. I even we even have the. The financial records. Improve that the House Intelligence Committee Authorize the funding for this operation against me and guess who. They gave the contracts out to all their buddies, just like always happens in Congress, and then take a look at this. When this we know, we wrap this up. Go look at the COVID select committee and look at the members who sit on on that committee and let who they represent. Every one of those committee members represents the pharmaceutical industry, or or, for example, dr Ralph Barrick and the University of North Carolina. They might as well call it the COVID cover-up committee. The thing is I have all the receipts approved that that Congress authorized the spending and approved of the DOD and FBI Doing all this crazy crap to me. So what's the follow-up going to be? Well, like I said, three days after I filed my DOD, oig, whistle blower complaint, reprisal complaint, and immediately went to ADR and Alternative dispute resolution, they were looking to settle and then they decided they wanted to launch a full investigation. Then general mightly steps down without reason, not a cycle. It's very abnormal for a general sitting in the joint cheese Just to step down in the middle of a, a Presidential term. That just doesn't happen. Nobody in the media at question why he stepped down, while I'll tell you why I stepped down because he was the head Officer in charge of this illegal your illegal operation against my family. And I mean they hovered. They flew jets around my house. They hovered helicopters over my house. I mean, I'm not kidding, I have all the evidence to prove this. My neighbors have seen it. They planted spy devices in my house. They hacked all my devices continuously with in combination with big tax help. I mean. So big, big tack late. For example, apple was probably just giving my encryption keys to the FBI. I Actually caught the FBI and the Michigan State Police trespassing on my property a number of times. Another crazy thing that happened is the FBI showed up in my house dressed as Michigan State police officers, just like the FBI did in the fed napping hoax with Governor Whitmer, and I have witnesses, witness to sell of this. So these people are going to pay if it's the last thing I ever do. But that's not. You know, I'm not a Reventful person. That's not how I want to live my life, but I do want there's some accountability in the government so this never happens to anyone else or any other. Us Again, just from merely telling the truth.

Speaker 1: 55:21

You know, I can't believe that your Demeanor is as poised and calm as it is. With all those things happen. I think I'd be a little bit angrier. Andrew, when do you expect your your first day in court, and how long do you think this process is going to take?

Speaker 3: 55:36

Oh, I think it's going to drag on for years. Even the the civil cases that were filed by Bruce Kipps in Texas and, excuse me, in the Western District of Texas and Missouri, and federal court are moving slow. The courts are dragging their feet on this. Nobody wants to deal with this. They're every although. So the three branches of government are trying to wait to see. It's like chess, and they want to see what the other branches are going to do and how they're going to react. And as anger builds in the United States, the old body that's going to be forced to do something is Congress, and there's people left and right on both sides, the other stepping down because you know they're getting sick of being part of the, the unit party, being controlled by the pharmaceutical, the military defense complex. We need to get leaders into Congress that have a spine and are willing to tackle, you know, roller sleeves up and tackle these issues. We just have people just sitting on DC, you know, going eating steaks, hanging out of K Street lobbyists and pushing whatever the narratives because they don't want to do any work. And One. One of the biggest challenges we have is, you know, holding offices is a is a public service job and it's all about constituent services. It's about providing good services back to the people you represent, and my party, the Republican Party, is no longer doing that with the party that the people that they're representing are huge business, they're representing huge billionaires, and the Republican Party is always sort of been that way, but I think it's worse now that it's ever been.

Speaker 1: 57:03

We've got about two minutes left in the broadcast. What would you like to leave the audience with and how can they support you?

Speaker 3: 57:10

Well, hey, follow me on acts, or formerly known as Twitter, my handles AG, huf. I have to give to Elon Musk. You know a lot of people complaining like oh, he's a globalist or whatever, but actually the X app gave me a voice and saved my life. So thank you, elon, and thank you Twitter or X.

Speaker 1: 57:26

Well, we're not big fans of Elon Musk over here. I gotta tell you lots of DARPA contracts over there with SpaceX and whatnot. Dr Andrew G Huff, it's always a pleasure to have you on on any developments. I hope you come back and, honestly, I hope you get way more media coverage, because we could really just spend an hour on your story and the harassment Alone. But this is a bigger issue and if you do decide to run for Congress and believe me, I believe that would be a thankless job for somebody as honest and with as much integrity as you have we'd love to have you back, we'd love to promote that campaign and we love you guys watching every Monday through Friday at 6 pm Eastern here at amp news dot US. Where the truth lives, it's not about left or right, it's always about right and wrong. I love you guys and we'll see on the flip side.

Speaker 4: 58:49

Who do you trust, and should you the small untrustworthy group of people who own and control almost every industry? Hope you will not even entertain the questions, let alone put in the time to explore the answers? These two volumes of the world awakens are an encyclopedia of trusted sources who give their honest overview of our real history, the world today and what lies ahead. Get the world awakens volume one and two, signed by author John Michael chambers, for only $50 each, or bundle the two and add genocide jab all three signed hardbacks for $120. Order today at amp news dot. Us. For unsigned and all other formats, visit Amazon or Barnes Noble.